01
Operating-model beachhead
The first 30 days are about establishing the AI-native pattern: tests as intent specs, AI accelerating implementation, engineers owning verification. Loop's engineer ships the first reference flows your team will copy.
A senior SDET on your team, beachheading AI-native quality.
Engagement
People
Delivery
Continuous engagement
Code
PPL-001
What you buy
An on-team engineer who lives the operating model.
The promise
Within 90 days you'll have a working example of AI-native quality engineering inside your team. And a teammate the rest of QA can learn from.
Who it's for
QA leaders who've tried staffing-firm SDETs, watched them fail to lift the bar, and want a mentor-grade engineer instead.
Buyer state. “We need someone who can show our team what AI-augmented testing actually looks like.”
What's inside
01
The first 30 days are about establishing the AI-native pattern: tests as intent specs, AI accelerating implementation, engineers owning verification. Loop's engineer ships the first reference flows your team will copy.
02
We don't add to your test suite. We change its shape. Replacing brittle UI tests with API/integration tests, fixing testability instead of mocking around it, generating Playwright tests from acceptance criteria when it actually compounds.
03
We instrument the suite so future decisions are data-driven: flaky failure clustering, escape-rate dashboards, regression drag tracking. Your QA function starts producing the truth about quality, not just running checks.
04
By the end of the engagement, your hiring rubric for QA looks different: AI fluency, system thinking, code testability instinct. Loop's engineer leaves an interview loop and a calibration deck so the bar holds after they leave.
Deliverables
The boss-approval frame
“We need to upgrade what QA looks like inside this team without firing anyone or buying yet another tool. Loop drops in a senior, mentor-grade engineer who shows the team what AI-augmented quality actually looks like. And we keep them only as long as they create leverage.”
ROI logic. Embedded QA pays for itself if it (a) prevents one bad senior hire, (b) eliminates one major regression-drag pattern, or (c) successfully transitions one teammate into the new function.
Up the ladder · Sideways · Related
Managed Hiring
Tech screenings for companies who don't yet know how to hire for AI.
See it →Audit · AUD-001QA Leverage Review
A one-day private review of your QA team, process, automation, dashboards, and constraints. Through a leverage lens.
See it →Sprint · SPR-001Quality Transformation Sprint
A 6–10 week implementation sprint where we work alongside your team to move QA from test execution to a higher-leverage quality operating model.
See it →The offer ladder
Pick by what you're trying to answer this quarter. Not by what tier looks "best." The depth of change escalates with the question. The entry course is publicly priced; higher tiers are scoped per engagement.
“Teach me the model.”
You leave with the framework, the worksheets, and a 90-day plan you can hand to your boss on Monday.
See this tier →“Apply the model to my current QA team.”
An outside diagnosis built around your team. You leave with the top-5 leverage opportunities, scored, and a 90-day plan ready for leadership.
See this tier →“Redesign our company-wide quality strategy.”
Cross-functional alignment, ownership clarity, and a 90-day implementation roadmap. Backed by 3 follow-up reviews so the strategy actually ships.
See this tier →“Lead the transformation.”
Quality intelligence dashboard, AI/automation pilot, manager operating cadence, and 180-day roadmap. Built into how the team actually works, not delivered as a deck.
See this tier →Most clients move up the ladder one tier at a time. Skipping tiers works only when the depth of change you need is obvious from the start.
90-Day QA Leverage Plan
Use it on Monday · Editable doc + Notion template